Was atmospheric electricity once safely harnessed and distributed? Was the architecture in the past specifically designed for this purpose (ie copper domes, spires and spheres)?
Atmospheric or free electricity is always available, this has been proved long ago with lighting rods for one example. It's supposedly not an efficient way for global needs, but perhaps it's actually more efficient and more cost effective -- which means it would never be in favor with big energy business.
Interestingly, everywhere you look, historical architecture points to YES, it was designed for this purpose (amongst others) and energy was both safely harnessed and distributed, likely using the aetheric field (which modern science now denies the existence of).
More recently it’s been said that electromagnetic energy was once extracted and stored in toroidal coils.
Star Fortresses around the world may have been production plants for the distribution of atmospheric energy -- as well as thousands of cathedrals, temples and palaces.
What they have in common is always their architecture— and the curious fact that many of the late 19th century builds were modified, repurposed or burned down. This is a large part of the Tartaria narrative and the 'mud floods'.
Take a look at some of these buildings -- keep in mind, this is the smallest of examples.
It’s also said energy harnessing of buildings from that time period are recognized by their red and white brick structures and copper domes.
True or not, there are many of those still existing in cities worldwide.
To add to the mystery, ley lines (which I talk about relating to sacred sites and crop circles) were used as trader’s tracks and “certain names appear with remarkable frequency along their routes. Names with red, white and black are common.”
And what of all the modern spires we see on skyscrapers? Those are added for an unofficial height competition. Really??
“Adding spire is a cheaper way to increase the height of the building, the cost for a skinny mast is much cheaper than solid concrete core and habitable floors.”
This is a relatively new thing, increasing 400% since the 1970’s. The top 10 tallest buildings in the world range between 39% to 27% of non-occupyable height. To me that sounds a bit ridiculous just to achieve the title of the world’s tallest building.
As for Tartaria/Tarta, well it certainly existed in varying sizes on old maps.
Food for Thought:
“In 1750, Benjamin Franklin hypothesized that a pointed iron rod during a lightning storm would light up at the tip, similar in appearance to Saint Elmo‘s fire.”
Saint Elmo’s fire is a plasma. Make of that what you will ...